Operating systems lecture:
Lecturer: Are there any advantages of writing threaded programs for a single core computer with no hyper-threading capability?
Me: There is! We humans have a sentimental inclination to implement the human thinking as if the problem could be solved in parts and threaded programs satisfy this sentimental need.
Lecturer: I don't think the compiler writers thought about the sentimental needs of people.
Me: But why didn't they leave computers at machine code? That was the sentimental attraction towards human like languages.
Some random discussion with pure mathematics lecturer:
Lecturer: Patterns within integer sequences exist in the universe. Humans have a special ability to find these patterns than any machine.
Me: Are integers or their patterns that important to the universe?
Lectuer: Must be. We can use the integer set to extend up to the rational set and probably the reals.
Me: But don't you think that integers looks important to us because of our sentimental attraction towards them?
L: How come?
Me: We developed this sentimental need to interpret everything based on integers because we were a counting civilization. Think about corals! if not for fish they would not have any reason to count integers. Corals are not individuals. The water around them is continuous. They would not have fallen in love with integers the way we did. For them, integers would not be something important out of reals. There are two books by Arthur C Clerk and Ian Stewart discussing this.
Do you remember when people were afraid to display affection, to express love was taboo and the FB HEART REACT changed everything?
This post is to archive a set of hilarious hypothetical scenario where a few students in our batch will go for internship, will piss off all...
Isn't it rather odd how much software people use the words like "Build from scratch" ,"Full package", "Rip it&...
This speech is co-authored :-) I am gonna put my version of the essay and the original one as well. It is up to you to figure out which one...